首页 诗词 字典 板报 句子 名言 友答 励志 学校 网站地图
当前位置: 首页 > 财会考试 > ACCA/CAT > 复习指导 >

2014ACCA《最新《审计与认证业务F8》重点总结二(2)

2014-01-11 

  3

  AUDIT RISK

  NOVEMBER 2011

  ISA 315, Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement Through

  Understanding the Entity and Its Environment identifies the following assertions:

  ? Assertions about classes of transactions and events for the period under

  audit – occurrence completeness, accuracy, cut off and classification.

  ? Assertions about account balances at the period end – existence, rights

  and obligations completeness, and valuation and allocation.

  ? Assertions about presentation and disclosure – occurrence and rights

  and obligations, completeness, classification and understandability, and

  accuracy and valuation.

  In addition, a risk can relate to a practical problem the audit team may face,

  such as attendance at inventory counts where the company has multiple sites

  holding simultaneous inventory counts, or if the company has had significant

  changes in their finance department and so the risk of fraud and error has

  increased.

  The common mistake is for candidates to identify a relevant issue from the

  scenario and then consider the risk to the company rather than to the auditor,

  linking into the related assertion.

  Therefore, using Question 3b from the June 2011 exam: ‘The travel agents are

  given a 90-day credit period to pay Donald Co; however, due to difficult trading

  conditions, a number of the receivables are struggling to pay.’ The audit risk

  related to this point is that if receivables are struggling to pay, then they may

  be overstated and, hence, valuation of receivables is the relevant risk.

  The business faces the risk of slow cash flows and so there is a business risk

  related to the liquidity of Donald Co. While going concern is an audit risk, the

  above point from the scenario is not sufficient on its own to indicate going

  concern risk.

  In addition, Question 1a from the June 2010 exam told candidates: ‘Purchase

  orders for overseas paint are made six months in advance and goods can be in

  transit for up to two months.’ The explanation of the audit risk would be to

  ascertain that the cut-off of inventory is appropriate at the year end. However,

  many candidates explained that the company may encounter problems with

  stock-outs of goods, which is focused more on operational business risk rather

  than on the risks to the financial statements.

  Other examples of audit risks include:

  ? treatment of capital and revenue expenditure – the risk here could relate

  to existence of property plant and equipment if revenue expenditure has

  been capitalised rather than charged as an expense in the income

  statement

  4

  AUDIT RISK

  NOVEMBER 2011

  ? valuation of inventory – when, for example, there are considerable levels

  of aged inventory

  ? completeness of liabilities – this could arise if provisions have been

  incorrectly treated as contingent liabilities

  ? completeness of revenue – this could be relevant where the entity being

  audited has significant cash sales.

  Responses to audit risks

  Having identified the audit risk candidates are often required to identify the

  relevant response to these risks. A common mistake made by candidates is to

  provide a response that management would adopt rather than the auditor.

  From Question 3b June 2011, in relation to the risk of valuation of receivables,

  as Donald Co had a number of receivables who were struggling to pay, many

  candidates suggested that management needed to chase these outstanding

  customers. This is not a response that the auditor would adopt, as they would

  be focused on testing valuation through after date cash receipts or reviewing

  the aged receivables ledger.

  Auditor’s responses should focus on how the team will obtain evidence to

  reduce the risks identified to an acceptable level. Their objective is confirming

  whether the financial statement assertions have been adhered to, and whether

  the financial statements are true and fair.

  Responses are not as detailed as audit procedures; instead they relate to the

  approach the auditor will adopt to confirm whether the transactions or

  balances are materially misstated. Therefore, in relation to the risk of going

  concern, the response is to focus on performing additional going concern

  procedures, such as reviews of cash flow forecasts.

  Also, auditor responses should not be too vague such as ‘increase substantive

  testing’ without making it clear how, or in what area, this would be addressed.

  In addition, candidates’ must ensure that they do not provide impractical

  responses. A common example of this is to request directly from the

  company’s bank as to whether the bank will provide a loan or renew a bank

  overdraft. The bank is not going to provide this type of information to the

  auditor, especially if they have not yet informed the company, and therefore

  this response will not generate any marks.

  Limited range of risks identified

  In order to score well in risk questions it is advisable to aim to identify a

  breadth of points from the question scenario. If the question asks for a specific

  number of audit risks, such as five, then it is not sufficient to identify just one

  or two risks. In addition, a common mistake is to identify a risk such as going

  5

  AUDIT RISK

  NOVEMBER 2011

  concern and then give this answer over and over again. In Question 3b of the

  June 2011 exam, there was only a maximum of one mark available for the

  description of going concern risk.

  Each scenario will have a variety of audit risks and candidates should, as part

  of their planning, aim to identify as many as possible. They should then decide

  which of the identified risks they will explain/describe in their answer. If the

  question asks for five risks, candidates should aim to identify six or seven

  points during their initial reading of the question. Candidates should then

  review their list and pick the five risks and responses that they feel they can

  expand on the most when writing up their answer.

  Conclusion

  Audit risk is, and will continue to be, an important element of the Paper F8

  syllabus. Candidates must understand the syllabus outcomes, understand what

  the question requirements involve and practise risk questions prior to the

  exam.

  Pami Bahl is the examiner for Paper F8

相关推荐:

2013年ACCA考试的考试技巧(最新整理)

ACCA2012年6月份考试真题及答案解析汇总

ACCA 学员与准会员2012 年薪酬职业调查分析

考生必看:2013年ACCA考试学习方法与注意事项


热点排行